I am very liberal. I usually vote as a Democrat in national elections, because I don't want to be part of tossing an election to a Republican by voting for a third-party candidate who hews more closely to what I actually believe. Now, I am not liberal in all things: this is where my status and identity as a scientist shows up. I am not a doctrinal leftist as a leftist quoi leftist, but a scientist, Quaker, and queer feminist whose politics flow from that. I could care less about the Democratic party as such, except when I hold specific members (or the leaders) in contempt for selling out. What I do care about are specific issues, such as equality regardless of race, sex, sexual orientation, or gender expression; science policy (such as federal funding issues, plus things like global warming, pollution prevention, and science education); and unwinding the pernicious influence of industry (especially defense and agro industries) in government.
Given the fact that I'm a lesbian and not terribly gender-conforming (I wear my hair long and like poofy skirts, but I don't wear makeup, high heels, or care much at all about what is fashionable), my interest in equality is largely motivated by self-interest. However, I must also admit that as a white person of middle-class upbringing and attitudes, I am very much the recipient of lots of privilege. Also, while I have some mental/psychological health issues, they're all invisible and don't dramatically make me the victim of bigotry. I am firmly committed to the viewpoint that I will never have true equality when people who don't have my advantages (race, appearance, invisible problems) are pushed down. This is why I am infuriated when gay rights organizations toss trans people under the bus, or when hate-crimes bills don't include trans protections.
Being someone who works in the biosciences, I care a great deal about science policy, as it is quite literally my lifeblood. Even more so: I work in a "controversial" area - I study human embryonic stem cells - so I am very much aware of how much my ability to do anything is highly dependent on the will of some policy person in Washington or Albany (as I'm in New York state). It infuriates me that my ability to do my job is decided by someone who doesn't know a lot about what it is I do. I believe, very firmly, that many of the social ills plaguing the country would be alleviated by a more firm focus on primary and high school education, making it easier for people to get a university education, and by an emphasis on science and math education. It wouldn't be an overnight transformation, of course, but it would go a long way, I think.
Given the fact that I'm a lesbian and not terribly gender-conforming (I wear my hair long and like poofy skirts, but I don't wear makeup, high heels, or care much at all about what is fashionable), my interest in equality is largely motivated by self-interest. However, I must also admit that as a white person of middle-class upbringing and attitudes, I am very much the recipient of lots of privilege. Also, while I have some mental/psychological health issues, they're all invisible and don't dramatically make me the victim of bigotry. I am firmly committed to the viewpoint that I will never have true equality when people who don't have my advantages (race, appearance, invisible problems) are pushed down. This is why I am infuriated when gay rights organizations toss trans people under the bus, or when hate-crimes bills don't include trans protections.
Being someone who works in the biosciences, I care a great deal about science policy, as it is quite literally my lifeblood. Even more so: I work in a "controversial" area - I study human embryonic stem cells - so I am very much aware of how much my ability to do anything is highly dependent on the will of some policy person in Washington or Albany (as I'm in New York state). It infuriates me that my ability to do my job is decided by someone who doesn't know a lot about what it is I do. I believe, very firmly, that many of the social ills plaguing the country would be alleviated by a more firm focus on primary and high school education, making it easier for people to get a university education, and by an emphasis on science and math education. It wouldn't be an overnight transformation, of course, but it would go a long way, I think.
There are no comments on this entry. (Reply.)